Thanks so much! Bloody brilliant. Slowly, slowly, slowly the truth must come out. Scientists don't like being told to ignore evidence, and being told not to curiously inquire into observations.
I assume you are across the Texas lawsuit against Pfizer et al? Another approach. Breach of Trade Practices. Probably the same here. But best of luck on your approach. I no longer trust the judiciary to do the lawful thing.
Go the good guys. The sooner a stop is put to this madness the better. And then maybe we can finally get to doing something about assisting those injured by the worldwide experiment - recognition of harm, exacerbated not treated by the Medical Industry and helping those that are not yet aware of harm before they pay the ultimate price for the malfeasance of others. #noamnesty #timefortruth
Best of luck, but it appeared the rulings of the judiciary were against those who appealed the mandate infringement on personal choice and liberty early on. I feel the judiciary are too deep in this mess now to reverse course, as the liability for all who pushed and coerced the injured into submitting to this dangerous novel tech would surely be huge if the DPP were to undertake prosecution. Of course deep down I do hope and wish for justice... I've just lost faith in our institutions (institutions I fully trusted at the start of this Pandemic... How sad and weak those institution's proved to be)
You are fortunate as no doubt interesting convos there. As a pleb it was astonishing hearing him say this, as I so naïvely thought, surely we then had it in the bag.
The Judiciary will not have acted in ignorance of the law or contrary to the law.
From my limited knowledge, it appears that all approaches to the judiciary for determinations have been conducted in the legal jurisdiction where the people present as legal fictions.
To be a plaintiff in all the readily available courts, one has to be a corporate entity of some sort.
The people who sought to rely on their unalienable rights to avert the "mandate" needed to file their suits in an equity division of the respective court, if it had one.
💉Despite attempted refutations to the contrary, UK pathologist Dr Clare Craig states (at 4:30 in) that the tried and tested MMR vaccine was shown back in 2020 to be very effective against the Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2. Why, then, was a novel technology of vaccination chosen instead?
I’m not giving an opinion. Many experts such as vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky have stated that the virus has been isolated. As is now known, however, its pathogenicity was grossly exaggerated in the young and working-age population. Here is a quote from PANDA - Pandemics, Data and Analytics (their former name): “”The consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza." ~ Dr Fauci. In March 2020, the WHO claimed mortality from COVID-19 = 3.4%. This represents deaths among cases, which then included only high-risk individuals in hospitals, with a higher risk of death than most. This figure falsely implied that the general public was at similar risk. Yet, if infected, the average mortality with COVID is similar to the flu at around 0.15% globally. COVID is NOT Ebola.”
Whoa....just fell off my chair..... Why promote breaching the alimentary tract by injecting anything at all, when there were various ORAL, CHEAP protocol alternatives that did the trick in terms of treatment and / or prevention - with the capacity for quick turn around, provided they were introduced at the onset (as per Drs Zelenko, Judy Stone, Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others). See the Ivermectin meta analysis.
The truth behind the hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin is, those successful protocols would squash the EUA of the Experimental Gene Technology (EGT) falsely renamed as "vaccines". With deft change of the exi-gene-tech name, no "selling" was required; the populace being already primed for decades, for the ever-willing reception of "a vaccine".
In the world of public opinion there is information. The evil doers are losing. Public officials are not stupid, they know exactly what is occurring. We the people need to force their hand, not "hope" they do better as if they are ignorant. Applying force is a skill, best done publicly.
The public officials are guilty of maladministration. Stateside we can and must remove them.
I think we should also look at the antibiotic resistance genes inserted into the plasmids used by phizer in their COvId vaccines as some of the plasmid material is contained in the vials of phizer COVID vaccines.
Phizer plasmids confer resistance to ampicillin ,neomycin and kanamycin.
This is particularly interesting in view of the fact that before COVID vaccines kanamycin was used to
successfully treat Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.Post COVId vaccine large outbreaks of kanamycin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections have been reported.
I think in the case of kanamycin resistance they hope to generate kanamycin resistant diseases and then offer a new expensive " vaccine" which will be on on patent , as a preventative measure.
My advice is to stick with the old BCG vaccine.If you have had the old BCG vaccine against tuberculosis you don't need a new T.B vaccine.Also there are alternatives to kanamycin. Don't let them tell you otherwise.
As an old Legal Secretary, I await, with bated breath, the outcome of this latest excursion into the breach!! May God be with you all🙏🏻💞💞💞
May God be with us, all.
How did Raels go with the Crime Conmission, was she on our side then? If she's got kids I'd run all this by them, see what they think of their future.
Thanks so much! Bloody brilliant. Slowly, slowly, slowly the truth must come out. Scientists don't like being told to ignore evidence, and being told not to curiously inquire into observations.
I assume you are across the Texas lawsuit against Pfizer et al? Another approach. Breach of Trade Practices. Probably the same here. But best of luck on your approach. I no longer trust the judiciary to do the lawful thing.
Go the good guys. The sooner a stop is put to this madness the better. And then maybe we can finally get to doing something about assisting those injured by the worldwide experiment - recognition of harm, exacerbated not treated by the Medical Industry and helping those that are not yet aware of harm before they pay the ultimate price for the malfeasance of others. #noamnesty #timefortruth
Best of luck, but it appeared the rulings of the judiciary were against those who appealed the mandate infringement on personal choice and liberty early on. I feel the judiciary are too deep in this mess now to reverse course, as the liability for all who pushed and coerced the injured into submitting to this dangerous novel tech would surely be huge if the DPP were to undertake prosecution. Of course deep down I do hope and wish for justice... I've just lost faith in our institutions (institutions I fully trusted at the start of this Pandemic... How sad and weak those institution's proved to be)
BUT, Ed Dowd has gone on the record saying "fraud annihilates the contract".
Surely this is evidence of gross negligence — given that there's no way peeps would have been disclosed this prior to receiving their dutiful jab.
UNinformed consent n all that...
Fingers crossed... Hoping to see justice... But not expecting much from the government at this stage... They're in it up to their necks...
Agree, the government seem to be complicit in stifling any evidence.
But taking on the judiciary (even though it also stinks) is another matter
....... hoping Julian dons his alligator wrestling gear for this one
Absolutely... Fingers crossed 🤞
Indeed, speak with him in person regularly. It is not because Ed says so, it is because it is true...
You are fortunate as no doubt interesting convos there. As a pleb it was astonishing hearing him say this, as I so naïvely thought, surely we then had it in the bag.
The Judiciary will not have acted in ignorance of the law or contrary to the law.
From my limited knowledge, it appears that all approaches to the judiciary for determinations have been conducted in the legal jurisdiction where the people present as legal fictions.
To be a plaintiff in all the readily available courts, one has to be a corporate entity of some sort.
The people who sought to rely on their unalienable rights to avert the "mandate" needed to file their suits in an equity division of the respective court, if it had one.
The law has been amended rather regularly these last few years.
🙏
💉Despite attempted refutations to the contrary, UK pathologist Dr Clare Craig states (at 4:30 in) that the tried and tested MMR vaccine was shown back in 2020 to be very effective against the Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2. Why, then, was a novel technology of vaccination chosen instead?
3 December 2023
https://youtu.be/Y2sA_gYI830?si=9UNtXfYwByCsLmma
absolute nonsense, none are safe, none are effective
the "virus" has never been isolated and proven to cause infective disease, none of them
the strain story is a rabbit hole
I’m not giving an opinion. Many experts such as vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky have stated that the virus has been isolated. As is now known, however, its pathogenicity was grossly exaggerated in the young and working-age population. Here is a quote from PANDA - Pandemics, Data and Analytics (their former name): “”The consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza." ~ Dr Fauci. In March 2020, the WHO claimed mortality from COVID-19 = 3.4%. This represents deaths among cases, which then included only high-risk individuals in hospitals, with a higher risk of death than most. This figure falsely implied that the general public was at similar risk. Yet, if infected, the average mortality with COVID is similar to the flu at around 0.15% globally. COVID is NOT Ebola.”
Whoa....just fell off my chair..... Why promote breaching the alimentary tract by injecting anything at all, when there were various ORAL, CHEAP protocol alternatives that did the trick in terms of treatment and / or prevention - with the capacity for quick turn around, provided they were introduced at the onset (as per Drs Zelenko, Judy Stone, Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others). See the Ivermectin meta analysis.
The truth behind the hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin is, those successful protocols would squash the EUA of the Experimental Gene Technology (EGT) falsely renamed as "vaccines". With deft change of the exi-gene-tech name, no "selling" was required; the populace being already primed for decades, for the ever-willing reception of "a vaccine".
How "clever" was that marketing!
How utterley brilliant!
How devastating.......
In the world of public opinion there is information. The evil doers are losing. Public officials are not stupid, they know exactly what is occurring. We the people need to force their hand, not "hope" they do better as if they are ignorant. Applying force is a skill, best done publicly.
The public officials are guilty of maladministration. Stateside we can and must remove them.
The legal system is maritime law for Americans.
No idea what the Austalian constitution holds.
NOTHING IS HIDDEN, it is all in front of our face; ALL we need to do is "see it!"
Bhula - opening mouth to change feet!
I think we should also look at the antibiotic resistance genes inserted into the plasmids used by phizer in their COvId vaccines as some of the plasmid material is contained in the vials of phizer COVID vaccines.
Phizer plasmids confer resistance to ampicillin ,neomycin and kanamycin.
This is particularly interesting in view of the fact that before COVID vaccines kanamycin was used to
successfully treat Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.Post COVId vaccine large outbreaks of kanamycin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections have been reported.
"Phizer plasmids confer resistance to ampicillin ,neomycin and kanamycin."
Shelagh, is that because they have each of these somewhere, tucked away individually, in their legacy vaccines?
I think in the case of kanamycin resistance they hope to generate kanamycin resistant diseases and then offer a new expensive " vaccine" which will be on on patent , as a preventative measure.
My advice is to stick with the old BCG vaccine.If you have had the old BCG vaccine against tuberculosis you don't need a new T.B vaccine.Also there are alternatives to kanamycin. Don't let them tell you otherwise.
Are you able to provide any guidance on the timeline for this?
open your eyes and look, it's all in plain sight.
G'day Jules
Thanks for your latest substack. Would it be appropriate to share the "Criminal Brief" submission with my health employer?
Thanks, Ben.
Thank-you for making this public knowledge. Dr Jeane's testimony is especially illuminating and likley applicable world-wide.