29 Comments
User's avatar
Lyn Eccleston's avatar

As an old Legal Secretary, I await, with bated breath, the outcome of this latest excursion into the breach!! May God be with you all🙏🏻💞💞💞

Expand full comment
Kaylene Emery's avatar

May God be with us, all.

Expand full comment
Roc Findlay's avatar

How did Raels go with the Crime Conmission, was she on our side then? If she's got kids I'd run all this by them, see what they think of their future.

Expand full comment
Nils Marchant's avatar

Thanks so much! Bloody brilliant. Slowly, slowly, slowly the truth must come out. Scientists don't like being told to ignore evidence, and being told not to curiously inquire into observations.

Expand full comment
Bucking the Trend's avatar

I assume you are across the Texas lawsuit against Pfizer et al? Another approach. Breach of Trade Practices. Probably the same here. But best of luck on your approach. I no longer trust the judiciary to do the lawful thing.

Expand full comment
AnnetteO's avatar

Go the good guys. The sooner a stop is put to this madness the better. And then maybe we can finally get to doing something about assisting those injured by the worldwide experiment - recognition of harm, exacerbated not treated by the Medical Industry and helping those that are not yet aware of harm before they pay the ultimate price for the malfeasance of others. #noamnesty #timefortruth

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Best of luck, but it appeared the rulings of the judiciary were against those who appealed the mandate infringement on personal choice and liberty early on. I feel the judiciary are too deep in this mess now to reverse course, as the liability for all who pushed and coerced the injured into submitting to this dangerous novel tech would surely be huge if the DPP were to undertake prosecution. Of course deep down I do hope and wish for justice... I've just lost faith in our institutions (institutions I fully trusted at the start of this Pandemic... How sad and weak those institution's proved to be)

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 4, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Fingers crossed... Hoping to see justice... But not expecting much from the government at this stage... They're in it up to their necks...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 4, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Absolutely... Fingers crossed 🤞

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

Indeed, speak with him in person regularly. It is not because Ed says so, it is because it is true...

Expand full comment
Peter Browning's avatar

The Judiciary will not have acted in ignorance of the law or contrary to the law.

From my limited knowledge, it appears that all approaches to the judiciary for determinations have been conducted in the legal jurisdiction where the people present as legal fictions.

To be a plaintiff in all the readily available courts, one has to be a corporate entity of some sort.

The people who sought to rely on their unalienable rights to avert the "mandate" needed to file their suits in an equity division of the respective court, if it had one.

Expand full comment
iya's avatar

The law has been amended rather regularly these last few years.

Expand full comment
LK's avatar

🙏

Expand full comment
David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

💉Despite attempted refutations to the contrary, UK pathologist Dr Clare Craig states (at 4:30 in) that the tried and tested MMR vaccine was shown back in 2020 to be very effective against the Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2. Why, then, was a novel technology of vaccination chosen instead?

3 December 2023

https://youtu.be/Y2sA_gYI830?si=9UNtXfYwByCsLmma

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

absolute nonsense, none are safe, none are effective

the "virus" has never been isolated and proven to cause infective disease, none of them

the strain story is a rabbit hole

Expand full comment
David White (Oz Dave)'s avatar

I’m not giving an opinion. Many experts such as vaccine developer Professor Nikolai Petrovsky have stated that the virus has been isolated. As is now known, however, its pathogenicity was grossly exaggerated in the young and working-age population. Here is a quote from PANDA - Pandemics, Data and Analytics (their former name): “”The consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza." ~ Dr Fauci. In March 2020, the WHO claimed mortality from COVID-19 = 3.4%. This represents deaths among cases, which then included only high-risk individuals in hospitals, with a higher risk of death than most. This figure falsely implied that the general public was at similar risk. Yet, if infected, the average mortality with COVID is similar to the flu at around 0.15% globally. COVID is NOT Ebola.”

Expand full comment
truth seeker's avatar

In the world of public opinion there is information. The evil doers are losing. Public officials are not stupid, they know exactly what is occurring. We the people need to force their hand, not "hope" they do better as if they are ignorant. Applying force is a skill, best done publicly.

The public officials are guilty of maladministration. Stateside we can and must remove them.

The legal system is maritime law for Americans.

No idea what the Austalian constitution holds.

Expand full comment
Malcolm Robert  William Loftes's avatar

NOTHING IS HIDDEN, it is all in front of our face; ALL we need to do is "see it!"

Expand full comment
Happy Days's avatar

Bhula - opening mouth to change feet!

Expand full comment
Shelagh Anne Shackleton's avatar

I think we should also look at the antibiotic resistance genes inserted into the plasmids used by phizer in their COvId vaccines as some of the plasmid material is contained in the vials of phizer COVID vaccines.

Phizer plasmids confer resistance to ampicillin ,neomycin and kanamycin.

This is particularly interesting in view of the fact that before COVID vaccines kanamycin was used to

successfully treat Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.Post COVId vaccine large outbreaks of kanamycin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections have been reported.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 5, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Shelagh Anne Shackleton's avatar

I think in the case of kanamycin resistance they hope to generate kanamycin resistant diseases and then offer a new expensive " vaccine" which will be on on patent , as a preventative measure.

My advice is to stick with the old BCG vaccine.If you have had the old BCG vaccine against tuberculosis you don't need a new T.B vaccine.Also there are alternatives to kanamycin. Don't let them tell you otherwise.

Expand full comment
Brett stix's avatar

Are you able to provide any guidance on the timeline for this?

Expand full comment
Malcolm Robert  William Loftes's avatar

open your eyes and look, it's all in plain sight.

Expand full comment
Ben Nosov's avatar

G'day Jules

Thanks for your latest substack. Would it be appropriate to share the "Criminal Brief" submission with my health employer?

Thanks, Ben.

Expand full comment
Eldric Vero's avatar

Thank-you for making this public knowledge. Dr Jeane's testimony is especially illuminating and likley applicable world-wide.

Expand full comment