thank you for the support shown towards this critical information
it is of historic importance where the country has only once before been confronted with the exercise of the unique jurisdiction enlivened by Section 72(ii) .. as such, most of our politicians need to be brought up to speed about their Constitutional duties
.. and when they exercise their Constitutional duties, they need to know The Will of The People
so please know we have received confirmation from an Australian organisation that will undertake the enormous task of informing Australians of what has occurred with respect to Justice Rofe and the Federal Court, assisting Australians should they choose, with contacting and informing their MPs and Senators (a) that they perform their Constitutional duty under Section 72(ii), and (b) if, as an Australian citizen, they consider this conduct amounts to 'misbehaviour' .. and if so, recommend to their MP and Senators that Justice Rofe be removed, and the Federal Court possibly sanctioned, possibly heavily
once Senators and MPs receive correspondence en mass about this affair, they will have no choice but to act, despite what their party may want
again, as this is a Constitutional matter now, it is a matter for all The People, just as though being a party to legal proceedings against this judge and this court
The People v. Rofe & Anor
more information about the organisation taking lead to inform Australians coming soon
"requires sitting Australian Senators and Members of Parliament to perform their Constitutional duties and make all necessary inquiries pursuant to Section 72(ii) - we appear to have a rogue judge whose conduct appears to be assisting all the wrong interests get away with Australia's greatest ever crime .."
Given that, with a few notable exceptions, all Members of Parliament were in on the scam, I think it quite unlikely they'll be doing as you suggest they should.
I admire and commend the tenacity of you and your team in the face of incredible malfeasance and obfuscation, Julian; you are a beacon of light and hope in a dark era.
Regarding the separation of powers and a compromised judiciary, I recall our first real, personal experience of this in the covid context in the lead up to my husband's Fair Work Commission hearing. A Fair Work Commissioner who had previously expressed an opinion sympathetic to those affected by mandates was unjustifiably relieved of her position. Anyone who may have shared her sympathies no doubt got the desired message and very few subsequent decisions by the Fair Work Commission in cases of those terminated due to mandates, ensued. The deck is undoubtedly stacked; however, knowing there are people of honour who will not give up regardless, is inspiring. Thank you.
The Rot goes a long way back, much futher than most can imagine. The judiciary failed way more than 50 years ago.
BUT. In 1900 Australians voted to adopt a Constitution for the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 including the Preamble Clauses 1 to 9 and The Schedule as Proclaimed and Gazetted in January 1901. This document including all the parts mentioned above with ONLY 8 carried amendments by Referendum of the people IS THE LAW. And no parliament or executive or court has any authority to alter the wording OR the meaning of these words (by legislation in Acts Interpretation Act) as intended when written. Austalians have sufferd a political coup by definition change in the meanings of words which has been done to comply with the intentions of foreign interests which is probably Treason.
Do NOT ask, request or demand the rights already bestowed on every Australia in LAW, USE WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY THE LAW OF THE PEOPLE IN 1900/01.
Quos Vult Perdere Jovis Prius Dementat when the gods want to destroy a nation they first make their leaders mad Evelyn Mcmenamin it is safer to trust in the one who loved us enough to die on the cross for our sin and rose again the third day to resurrection life
It must stick in your craw calling these creatures "honourable." Swapping a crook for a crook within the crooked "system", best wishes with that attempt. If they ALL knew in the first instance, it'll be same 🐎 different jockey.
and what sort of outcome are any of you expecting in a BAR controlled court Julian?;
why are none of you :LEGAL; types calling for or demanding Constitutional (English) Common Law Courts?;
is that because you're afraid of losing your BAR granted LIE-SENSE to PRACTICE Law in their BAR controlled courts that are under the umbrella of the Corporation known as AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT and its STATE subsidiaries?;
Bring back Common Law Courts where 'the judge' is a jury of our peers and not some pompous arsehole(s) who thinks he/she/they has/have a right to sit in judgement over all of us while they themself sit in perjury every single time they 'sit at the bench' and open their filthy mouths to pass judgment over their fellow man from behind 'the BAR';
what say you Julian?; you're educated in Law...are you man enough to help restore Law, Order and Good Governance to this Land or are you going to forever remain a sworn oath servant to 'the BAR'?,
I thank you for providing me the ability to support you directly without the leaches that get in on the act and act in unconscionable ways so that I have to close my bank accounts and re-open them to remove their cheating sticky fingers from my money.
So enjoy your second cup of coffee on me.
I think I have said it before but given the comments below it bears repeating.
In about 2020 I saw a presentation which characterized what was happening as being like a cruise ship taken over by pirates in the dead of night. When the passengers wake up in the morning the ship has changed course, the former crew is nowhere to be seen. Life is different on board, to some unbearable but for most on balance just get on with it after all what is there to do the former system is gone.
What you describe today is this situation playing out.
The task in front of us is overwhelming but if we do nothing we accept the pirates.
All judges worldwide were bought off and corrupted by George Soros and his World Economic Forum accomplices long before they started the covid19 scam. Obviously they knew what would be coming down the line in the future. There will be no justice, or accountability until the judiciary system worldwide is dismantled and built against from scratch. This also applies to the political system,even the so called security systems have all been corrupted by the World Economic Forum and their associates worldwide. What's happened over the past four years,was pre-planned decades ago.
While these cases are useful as a means of communication from the government via the legal system in terms of further revealing the 'state' of vaccine production and procurement under Emergency Use Authorisation (see Brooke Jackson in the US), I would caution people against getting excited that what they are seeing is any form of 'justice.'
I published Australia's Novavax contract and two of the clauses were:
-No guarantee of successful vaccine development, no guarantee of positive clinical outcome.
-The Australian government indemnified Novavax from any losses originating from the vaccine - from testing to deployment.
I do not have the Pfizer or Moderna contracts for Australia, but one would think that before submitting a case, this would be a matter of discovery or at least curiosity.
I also wonder why the doctor who was the plaintiff in this case injected so many people without performing due diligence that these injections were dangerous, and kept injecting people over such a long time period. If one were to find a plaintiff that could demonstrate 'GMO injury,' one would have to demonstrate that one's DNA was changed as a result of the injections or suffered a physical 'GMO injury,' not a plaintiff that had suffered spiritual/moral regret. In my opinion it was a poor choice of plaintiff in the case and this line of enquiry will always be tenuous.
Yet, if lawyers were actually interested in effecting change they would look at (for example) the legal structure behind the CMO's ability to declare an Emergency based on one letter under the Human Biosecurity Act 2015 and challenge the burden of proof of the contents therein, then, the legal structure itself.
However, there is zero chance of any lawyers taking this route above because there is no chance of financial compensation from damages awarded, does not generate sexy headlines, and requires a lot of difficult political work at the grassroots level. However, it is the only way we can ensure there will be no Emergencies and, therefore, vaccine mandates like we saw, ever again.
thank you for the support shown towards this critical information
it is of historic importance where the country has only once before been confronted with the exercise of the unique jurisdiction enlivened by Section 72(ii) .. as such, most of our politicians need to be brought up to speed about their Constitutional duties
.. and when they exercise their Constitutional duties, they need to know The Will of The People
so please know we have received confirmation from an Australian organisation that will undertake the enormous task of informing Australians of what has occurred with respect to Justice Rofe and the Federal Court, assisting Australians should they choose, with contacting and informing their MPs and Senators (a) that they perform their Constitutional duty under Section 72(ii), and (b) if, as an Australian citizen, they consider this conduct amounts to 'misbehaviour' .. and if so, recommend to their MP and Senators that Justice Rofe be removed, and the Federal Court possibly sanctioned, possibly heavily
once Senators and MPs receive correspondence en mass about this affair, they will have no choice but to act, despite what their party may want
again, as this is a Constitutional matter now, it is a matter for all The People, just as though being a party to legal proceedings against this judge and this court
The People v. Rofe & Anor
more information about the organisation taking lead to inform Australians coming soon
Without honest media we can’t ever get the message out to the majority. They know this and use it to their advantage!
"requires sitting Australian Senators and Members of Parliament to perform their Constitutional duties and make all necessary inquiries pursuant to Section 72(ii) - we appear to have a rogue judge whose conduct appears to be assisting all the wrong interests get away with Australia's greatest ever crime .."
Given that, with a few notable exceptions, all Members of Parliament were in on the scam, I think it quite unlikely they'll be doing as you suggest they should.
I admire and commend the tenacity of you and your team in the face of incredible malfeasance and obfuscation, Julian; you are a beacon of light and hope in a dark era.
Regarding the separation of powers and a compromised judiciary, I recall our first real, personal experience of this in the covid context in the lead up to my husband's Fair Work Commission hearing. A Fair Work Commissioner who had previously expressed an opinion sympathetic to those affected by mandates was unjustifiably relieved of her position. Anyone who may have shared her sympathies no doubt got the desired message and very few subsequent decisions by the Fair Work Commission in cases of those terminated due to mandates, ensued. The deck is undoubtedly stacked; however, knowing there are people of honour who will not give up regardless, is inspiring. Thank you.
Is 'conflict of interest' misbehaviour?
Brilliant summary and call to action. Thank you, Julian and team. Sharing!
The Rot goes a long way back, much futher than most can imagine. The judiciary failed way more than 50 years ago.
BUT. In 1900 Australians voted to adopt a Constitution for the Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 including the Preamble Clauses 1 to 9 and The Schedule as Proclaimed and Gazetted in January 1901. This document including all the parts mentioned above with ONLY 8 carried amendments by Referendum of the people IS THE LAW. And no parliament or executive or court has any authority to alter the wording OR the meaning of these words (by legislation in Acts Interpretation Act) as intended when written. Austalians have sufferd a political coup by definition change in the meanings of words which has been done to comply with the intentions of foreign interests which is probably Treason.
Do NOT ask, request or demand the rights already bestowed on every Australia in LAW, USE WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY THE LAW OF THE PEOPLE IN 1900/01.
Quos Vult Perdere Jovis Prius Dementat when the gods want to destroy a nation they first make their leaders mad Evelyn Mcmenamin it is safer to trust in the one who loved us enough to die on the cross for our sin and rose again the third day to resurrection life
There are Zero (0) citizens in the Constitution for the Commonwealth of Australia.
There are 'People of the Nation', 'Peoples of the States', and 'Electors'.
It must stick in your craw calling these creatures "honourable." Swapping a crook for a crook within the crooked "system", best wishes with that attempt. If they ALL knew in the first instance, it'll be same 🐎 different jockey.
and what sort of outcome are any of you expecting in a BAR controlled court Julian?;
why are none of you :LEGAL; types calling for or demanding Constitutional (English) Common Law Courts?;
is that because you're afraid of losing your BAR granted LIE-SENSE to PRACTICE Law in their BAR controlled courts that are under the umbrella of the Corporation known as AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT and its STATE subsidiaries?;
Bring back Common Law Courts where 'the judge' is a jury of our peers and not some pompous arsehole(s) who thinks he/she/they has/have a right to sit in judgement over all of us while they themself sit in perjury every single time they 'sit at the bench' and open their filthy mouths to pass judgment over their fellow man from behind 'the BAR';
what say you Julian?; you're educated in Law...are you man enough to help restore Law, Order and Good Governance to this Land or are you going to forever remain a sworn oath servant to 'the BAR'?,
Wonderful as usual.
I thank you for providing me the ability to support you directly without the leaches that get in on the act and act in unconscionable ways so that I have to close my bank accounts and re-open them to remove their cheating sticky fingers from my money.
So enjoy your second cup of coffee on me.
I think I have said it before but given the comments below it bears repeating.
In about 2020 I saw a presentation which characterized what was happening as being like a cruise ship taken over by pirates in the dead of night. When the passengers wake up in the morning the ship has changed course, the former crew is nowhere to be seen. Life is different on board, to some unbearable but for most on balance just get on with it after all what is there to do the former system is gone.
What you describe today is this situation playing out.
The task in front of us is overwhelming but if we do nothing we accept the pirates.
You do not and neither do I.
My comment suggests 3 actions:
1. Visualise the joy and justice you want . . and hold it in your heart.
2. Make those calls/emails/letters until you get a human response.
3. Dig in and donate. The money puts 3d wheels on your intention . . this action needs traction!
Enough said.
💯 percent correct.
All judges worldwide were bought off and corrupted by George Soros and his World Economic Forum accomplices long before they started the covid19 scam. Obviously they knew what would be coming down the line in the future. There will be no justice, or accountability until the judiciary system worldwide is dismantled and built against from scratch. This also applies to the political system,even the so called security systems have all been corrupted by the World Economic Forum and their associates worldwide. What's happened over the past four years,was pre-planned decades ago.
While these cases are useful as a means of communication from the government via the legal system in terms of further revealing the 'state' of vaccine production and procurement under Emergency Use Authorisation (see Brooke Jackson in the US), I would caution people against getting excited that what they are seeing is any form of 'justice.'
I published Australia's Novavax contract and two of the clauses were:
-No guarantee of successful vaccine development, no guarantee of positive clinical outcome.
-The Australian government indemnified Novavax from any losses originating from the vaccine - from testing to deployment.
https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-novavax-contract
I do not have the Pfizer or Moderna contracts for Australia, but one would think that before submitting a case, this would be a matter of discovery or at least curiosity.
I also wonder why the doctor who was the plaintiff in this case injected so many people without performing due diligence that these injections were dangerous, and kept injecting people over such a long time period. If one were to find a plaintiff that could demonstrate 'GMO injury,' one would have to demonstrate that one's DNA was changed as a result of the injections or suffered a physical 'GMO injury,' not a plaintiff that had suffered spiritual/moral regret. In my opinion it was a poor choice of plaintiff in the case and this line of enquiry will always be tenuous.
Yet, if lawyers were actually interested in effecting change they would look at (for example) the legal structure behind the CMO's ability to declare an Emergency based on one letter under the Human Biosecurity Act 2015 and challenge the burden of proof of the contents therein, then, the legal structure itself.
However, there is zero chance of any lawyers taking this route above because there is no chance of financial compensation from damages awarded, does not generate sexy headlines, and requires a lot of difficult political work at the grassroots level. However, it is the only way we can ensure there will be no Emergencies and, therefore, vaccine mandates like we saw, ever again.